Development and Characterization of Hydrogel containing Finasteride

 

Wajid Ahmad*, Rihan Jawed

Department of Pharmaceutics, Institute of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: wajidahmad806@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The major goal of this study was to create a controlled-release dosage form utilizing a cellulose-based hydrogel that was cross-linked with propylene glycol. Hydrogels were made by crosslinking the polymer Sodium Alginate + Na CMC with propylene glycol, a suitable crosslinking agent. There is no indication of interaction between the medication, polymers, and other excipients, according to an IR and DSC analysis. The hydrogel gave good swelling and controlled release properties due to the cross linking process. The effect of Calcium Chloride concentration on drug content and t75 percent CDR was found to be non-significant based on the findings. However, the influence of Calcium Chloride concentration on swelling index was substantial, indicating that as Calcium Chloride concentration rose, the swelling index of the hydrogel decreased. Again, the effect of response time on drug content and t75 of percent CDR was substantial, implying that as reaction time rose, drug content and t75 of percent CDR of hydrogel increased as well. However, the effect of response time on the swelling index was not statistically significant. Drug content, swelling index, and t75 of percent CDR of run BB1 are the best than compared with based on all responses. This run's drug content, swelling index, and t75 percent CDR are respectively 99.5 percent, 276.64 percent, and 3.5 hrs. So BB1 was used to test the improved formulation, which produced the best in vitro release of 94.24 percent in 6hrs. Different kinetic models were fitted to the in vitro data which showed the best model was higuchi with non-fickian mode of drug release and stability data showed that the formulations were stable during the time span of the study. From the study it was concluded that the prepared hydrogel can provide a sustained release effect with better bioavailability which will surely enhance its absorption throughout the body.

 

KEYWORDS: Finasteride, Hydrogel, Factorial Design, Cross-linking, Controlled-Release Dosage Form.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

There is no exact control over drug release in traditional dosage forms, and the supplied dose of medication reaches the systemic circulation immediately. The goal of designing oral controlled medication delivery systems should be to provide more predictable and improved drug bioavailability. Among all the methods that have been investigated for the systemic delivery of medicines via diverse pharmaceutical products of varied dose forms, the oral drug delivery system has made significant progress as the most commonly used route of drug administration1-2.

 

Hydrogels are hydrophilic, three-dimensional polymeric networks capable of absorbing huge quantities of water or biological fluids. The networks are made up of homopolymers or copolymers and are insoluble owing to chemical crosslink’s (tie-points, junctions), as well as physical crosslink’s such entanglements and crystallites. The latter is responsible for network structure and physical security3-4.

 

Finasteride is classified as a synthetic 4-azasteroid drug. It works as an enzyme inhibitor. It is used to treat anti-hyperplasia and also as an anti-baldness agent. Finasteride's mechanism of action is based on its preferential inhibition of Type II 5a-reductase via the formation of a stable complex with the enzyme. This enzyme transforms testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a more potent androgenic hormone. Type II 5a-reductase inhibition prevents the peripheral conversion of testosterone to DHT95-6.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Finasteride was procured from Yarrow Chem Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, Calcium Chloride was obtained from Rankem Chemicals Ltd. Ahmadabad and Sodium Alginate and Na CMC was obtained from S.D Fine Chem Mumbai. All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade, and were used as obtained.

 

Standard Calibration Curve:

The standard calibration curve of Finasteride was carried out on UV spectrophotometer by using phosphate buffer of pH 7.4 as the solvent. From the solution which is now having a concentration of 100μg/ml samples of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5ml were pipette out into 10ml volumetric flasks. The volume was made up to the mark with Phosphate buffer 7.4 to get the final concentration of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 μg/ml respectively. The absorbance of concentration was measured at 304nm7-8.

 

Drug-Excipients Interaction Study9-10:

Fourier Transformation Infra-red Spectroscopy:

The study by FTIR of the drug and excipient was carried out by conventional KBr plate method in order to study the interaction of the drug and polymer so as to determine the physical as well as chemical changes that can occur during the formulation. For this the mixture of powder of excipient and pure was mixed in a ratio of 1:1 with potassium bromide and the small pellet was formed by pressing the mixture in a hydraulic press and the FT-IR was carried out in the frequency range 400-4000 cm-1.

 

Differential Scanning Calorimeter: 

The DSC study was carried out by studying thermo­grams of pure drug and its physical mixture with polymers was carried out to investigate any possible interaction between the drug and the utilized polymer. The selected heating rate is from 50°C to 400°C at an increase of 20°C per minute using Differential Scanning Calorimeter.

 

Formulation of Hydrogel:

The Finasteride hydrogel formula was created utilizing Sodium Alginate + Na CMC as a polymer at a concentration of 2% w/v and Calcium Chloride as a cross linking agent at a concentration of 1-3% w/v. Initially, the correct weights of Finasteride, propylene glycol, and Sodium Alginate + Na CMC were used. The water was then measured and put into a beaker with a motorized stirrer. Drug was dissolved in the minimum quantity of Calcium Chloride then polymer was dissolved in the required amount of water and both the solution was mixed together followed by the remaining amount of propylene glycol. This solution is then poured onto a china dish set in an 80±2°C thermostatic water bath. The reaction was kept going for another two hours until the water gets completely evaporate from the prepared hydrogel. The hydrogel is then placed in the oven to dry. The formulation chart of hydrogel preparation is depicted in Table 2. The dried hydrogel is then wrapped in an aluminium foil and stored in a desiccator for further use11-13.

 

Table 1: Formulation Chart of Hydrogel

Batch

Sodium Alginate +Na CMC (%w/v)

Calcium Chloride (%w/v)

Stirring Time (min)

Distilled Water (ml)

BB1

2%

1%

120

10ml

BB2

2%

3%

60

10ml

BB3

2%

2%

60

10ml

BB4

2%

2%

120

10ml

BB54

2%

1%

60

10ml

BB6

2%

3%

90

10ml

BB7

2%

3%

120

10ml

BB8

2%

3%

90

10ml

BB9

2%

1%

90

10ml

BB10

2%

2%

90

10ml

BB11

2%

2%

90

10ml

 

Evaluation of Hydrogels:

Percent Yield:

The evaluation parameter of percentage yield calculates the amount of practical yield obtained after the experiment of a particular batch. This parameter gives the efficiency of the process involved14. In the current experiment the parameter is calculated by the following formula:

                               Practical Yield

Percent Yield = ------------------------- × 100

                            Theoretical Yield

 

Drug Content:

1gm of hydrogel was weighed and transferred to a beaker containing phosphate buffer pH 7.4 which was previously mounted on a mechanical stirrer. Continued the stirring for 12 hrs to dissolve the hydrogel completely in to solvent. Then obtained solution was filtered studied under double beam UV spectrophotometer at 304nm15.

 

Drug content can be determined by using formula:

 

                                       Practical Value

Drug Content (%) =    ------------------------- × 100

                                       Theoretical Value

 

Swelling Index:

The swelling index of hydrogel was determined by placing the weighed hydrogel in the basket. For first 2 hrs the dissolution medium was 0.1N HCl then followed by phosphate buffer pH 7.4 for further study, at 37şC± 0.5şC. Hydrogel samples were withdrawn at a time interval of 30 min, blotted with tissue paper to remove the excess water and weighed on the analytical balance16. Swelling index was calculated by using the following formula:

 

              Weight of swollen hydrogel – Weight of dry hydrogel

Swelling Index (%) = ------------------------------------------ × 100

                                       Weight of dry hydrogel

 

In vitro Dissolution Studies:

In vitro dissolution tests were conducted in triplicate for all formulations in a USP type II dissolution test apparatus. The dissolution medium used was 900ml 0.1N HCl for 2hr, followed by phosphate buffer of pH 7.4 at 370C±0.50C. The speed of rotation was maintained to 50 RPM. The prepared hydrogel were tied in the dialysis membrane which was previously soaked in the phosphate buffer of pH 7.4. The dialysis membrane was then tied on both the ends so that the hydrogel remains in the center of the membrane. 5ml of sample were withdrawn at regular interval of time and 5ml of dissolution medium was replaced by freshly prepared medium in order to maintain the sink condition. The withdrawn samples were filtered through Whatman filter paper and diluted to 10 ml with the same dissolution medium. The absorbance of resultant samples of all intervals was measured at 304nm using double beam UV- spectrophotometer17-19.

 

Scanning Electron Microscopy:

SEM was used to evaluate the surface morphology of the cross linked hydrogel produced with three different doses of citric acid: 1%, 2%, and 3%. The samples were strewn onto double-sided tape, sputter-coated with platinum, and inspected under a 10 kV microscope20.

 

Release Kinetic Studies:

The analysis of drug release from swellable hydrogel requires a flexible model capable of identifying the contribution to overall kinetics. To determine the kinetic modeling of drug release, the dissolution profiles of all batches were fitted to different models such as zero-order, first order, Korsmeyer Peppas, and Higuchi21-22.

 

Stability Study:

The need of stability testing is to test the product and also to provide evidence on how the quality of a drug substance or drug product varies with time underneath the influence of assorted environmental factors like temperature, light, humidity, and allows suggested storage conditions, re-test periods and shelf lives to be established23-24.In the present study, stability studies were carried out at Room Temperature at 25°C±2°C/ 60% RH ± 5% RH and Accelerated testing at 40°C±2°C /75% RH±5% RH for 3 months for the optimized formulation. The optimized formulation was analyzed for the swelling ratio, % drug content, % drug release and t75.

 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

Standard Calibration Curve:

The results of standard calibration curve revealed that it follows the beers lamberts law as the equation obtained was linear with the values of y =0.014x + 0.005 and the regression value of R2 = 0.999.

 

 

Figure 1: Standard Calibration Curve of Finasteride

 

Drug –Excipient Interaction Study:

The results from FTIR of pure Finasteride represented the following band characteristics at 3309cm-1 of Free O-H stretching vibration, 1458, 1504, 1597cm-1 exhibited benzene skeleton vibrations, and 995cm-1 represented bending vibration of C=C-H, the typical transolefinic band. The results of FTIR were compared with the standard and it was found that the pure drug was having the same peaks as that of the standard which confirmed that the drug was pure and the optimized formulation was then matched with the peaks of pure drug and it was seen that there was no new formation, disappearance, mismatching of peaks.

 

Thermal Study:

The DSC study of pure drug shows the melting point of 267.24oC which indicates its purity and the optimized formulation reveals the melting point of 281.56oC. From the thermal study of the pure drug and the optimized formulation revealed that the drug was pure and when mixed with the excipients it shows a slight difference in the melting point which was not a significant difference in the temperature and therefore it was concluded that the drug was pure and it shows less physical or chemical interaction with the excipients.

 


 

Figure 2: a) FTIR of Pure Drug, b) FTIR of Optimized Formulation, c) DSC of Pure Drug, d) DSC of Optimized Formulation

 

 


Evaluation Parameters:

The percentage yield, drug content and swelling ratio of the prepared hydrogel was found to be within the range of 71.25±0.28-85.14±1.27%, 87.98±1.82-99.54±0.87%, and 158.21±0.14-267.74±0.25%. From the evaluated results it can be concluded that the prepared hydrogel were having a better drug content efficiency, a good swelling property which can hold a larger amount of water for sustained release action and lastly the percentage yield was quite excellent which shows that there was a minimum wastage of the materials used. From all the batches it was seen that the batch of BB1was having higher drug content with better yield and better swelling ratio than compared with the others.

 

Table 2: Evaluation of Hydrogel

Batch

Percent Yield (%)

Drug Content (%)

Swelling Ratio (%)

BB1

85.14±1.27

99.54±0.87

267.74±0.25

BB2

81.64±0.78

94.28±0.47

158.21±0.14

BB3

77.41±1.85

97.34±0.74

195.92±0.87

BB4

79.96±0.76

89.87±0.72

208.98±0.65

BB5

80.12±1.31

85.63±0.29

247.08±0.68

BB6

78.35±0.11

88.37±1.58

205.02±0.17

BB7

77.25±1.38

87.98±1.82

169.94±0.87

BB8

71.25±0.28

96.87±0.31

164.56±1.84

BB9

82.37±0.15

92.58±0.31

255.42±0.58

BB10

81.24±0.25

90.28±0.68

202.74±1.87

BB11

83.47±1.82

89.67±0.42

208.84±1.11

 

Figure 3: Results for Evaluation Parameters of Prepared Hydrogel Batches

 

In-vitro Drug Release:

The drug release study of the prepared hydrogel revealed that the drug release ranges between of 23.98±2.3-97.24±0.7%. From this data it was seen that the batch of BB1 as having a better amount of drug release i.e. 97.24±0.7% in the time period of6 hours than compared with the other batches as shown in Figure6.From this study it can be concluded that the cross-linking is having an effect on the rate of drug release which is not significant. But to a certain extent we can say that the more is the cross-linking the more sustained is the drug release. So, finally it can be concluded that the batch BB1 is the optimized batch. This optimized batch was further studied for the stability study.

 

Figure 4: In-vitro Drug Release of Prepared Hydrogel

 

Scanning Microscopy:

The surface morphology of the cross-linked polymer was studied by employing SEM. The results showed that there is more cross linking for hydrogel formulation BB1 than BB4 which is far more than BB7 revealed as rough surface of morphology which can be seen in Figure 8. This is because cross linking occurs much higher at low citric acid concentration as the hydrogel formulations BB1, BB4 and BB7 have been formulated at reaction time 120min by varying the concentration of Calcium Chloride 1, 2 and 3% respectively.

 

Figure 5: SEM Study of BB1 (A), BB4 (B), BB7 (C)

 

Kinetics Study:

The in vitro data were fitted to different kinetic models. The drug release of almost all batches including Finasteride hydrogels followed Higuchi model of release kinetics. The mechanism of drug release from hydrogel formulation was anomalous (non-fickian) diffusion.

 

Table 3: Kinetics Study of the Prepared Hydrogel

Batch

Zero order (R2)

First order (R2)

Korsmeyer Peppas (R2)

Higuchi (R2)

Release Exponent (n)

BB1

0.852

0.740

0.907

0.939

0.624

BB2

0.907

0.823

0.947

0.964

0.574

BB3

0.897

0.883

0.954

0.955

0.473

BB4

0.807

0.720

0.890

0.909

0.485

BB5

0.837

0.716

0.892

0.926

0.613

BB6

0.858

0.824

0.957

0.945

0.436

BB7

0.737

0.640

0.831

0.854

0.440

BB8

0.821

0.794

0.908

0.908

0.315

BB9

0.848

0.717

0.892

0.933

0.640

BB10

0.868

0.812

0.952

0.952

0.458

BB11

0.856

0.797

0.943

0.944

0.470

 

Stability Study:

The stability study of the prepared hydrogel for the optimized batch BB1 revealed that the prepared batch was quite stable during the time of study at both room temperature and accelerated study. During this study the optimized batch was evaluated for the parameters such as swelling ratio, percent drug content, percent drug release and t75 respectively. These evaluation parameters showed that there is a slight decrease in the swelling ratio, drug content and drug release pattern but the t75 remains the same in both the study i.e. room temperature and accelerated stability study. The data obtained from these evaluation was having a negligible changes i.e. the changes observed during the studies were negligible and therefore it can be concluded that the optimized batch was stable during the study period.

 

Table 4: Stability of BB1 at Room Temperature (25°C±2°C/60% RH ± 5% RH)

Day (s)

Swelling Ratio (%)

Drug Content (%)

Drug Release (%)

t75 (hours)

00

267.74±0.25

99.54±0.87

97.24±0.70

3.46

15

267.74±0.25

99.54±0.87

97.24±0.81

3.46

30

267.74±0.74

99.54±0.87

97.24±1.74

3.46

45

267.74±0.87

99.54±0.15

97.24±1.98

3.46

60

265.74±0.28

99.45±0.28

97.15±0.89

3.46

75

265.15±0.18

99.21±0.31

96.95±1.21

3.46

90

264.98±1.38

98.99±0.84

96.84±1.98

3.46

 

Table 5: Stability of BB1 for Accelerated testing (40°C±2°C/75 % RH ± 5% RH)

Day(s)

Swelling Ratio (%)

Drug Content (%)

Drug Release (%)

t75 (hours)

00

267.74±0.25

99.54±0.87

97.24±0.70

3.46

15

267.74±0.25

99.54±0.87

97.24±0.7

3.46

30

267.74±0.25

99.25±1.89

97.07±0.51

3.46

45

266.58±1.15

99.18±0.28

96.87±1.87

3.46

60

266.47±0.48

98.94±0.21

96.34±0.82

3.46

75

266.38±1.85

98.54±1.26

96.19±0.47

3.46

90

266.28±1.15

98.27±1.98

96.08±0.31

3.46

 

CONCLUSION:

Hydrogels containing Finasteride were prepared in order to increase its release time as well as to provide a better absorption of the drug throughout the body by increasing its bioavailability. Hydrogels are known to sustain the release rate of the drug which employs various types of hydrophilic polymers like Sodium Alginate+ Na CMC has been used in this experiment. The prepared hydrogel was then evaluated for various parameters and it was found that from the prepared batches of hydrogel the BB1 was the optimized formulation as it was having maximum drug content, maximum amount of drug release and all the other parameters were in the favor of the same batch for optimization

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of advanced research. 2015 Mar 1;6(2):105-21.

2.     Bhattarai N, Gunn J, Zhang M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2010 Jan 31;62(1):83-99.

3.     Ishihara M, Obara K, Nakamura S, Fujita M, Masuoka K, Kanatani Y, Takase B, Hattori H, Morimoto Y, Ishihara M, Maehara T. Chitosan hydrogel as a drug delivery carrier to control angiogenesis. Journal of Artificial Organs. 2006 Mar;9(1):8-16.

4.     Raut S, Uplanchiwar V, Bhadoria S, Gahane A, Jain SK, Patil S. Comparative evaluation of zidovudine loaded hydrogels and emulgels. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2012;5(1):41-5.

5.     Obaid FN, Jaffat HS. Physiological and histological study of the effect of finasteride drug (Prostacare) on the fertility of albino male rats. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(6):2323-5.

6.     Park SY, Kim KB, Ahn SH, Kim HH. The effects of SM-215 on androgeneticalopecia. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(5):1745-51.

7.     Malviya VR, Pande SD, Bobade NN. Preparation and Evaluation of Sustained Release Beads of Zolmitriptan Hydrochloride. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;12(12):5972-6.

8.     Malviya VR, Pande SD. Road CKN. Preparation ad Evaluation of Zolmitriptan Hydrochloride Lozenge. J Pharma Res. 2019;8(8):624-9.

9.     Malviya V, Ladhake V, Gajbiye K, Satao J, Tawar M. Design and Characterization of Phase Transition System of Zolmitriptan Hydrochloride for Nasal Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology. 2020 May 31;13(3):4942-51.

10.   Malviya V, Pande S. Development and Evaluation of Fast dissolving Film of Fluoxetine hydrochloride. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Oct 31;14(10):5345-50.

11.   Nandhakumar L, Dharmamoorthy G, Chandrasekaran S. Hydrogels: A multifaceted contemporary approaches and advancements. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011;4(11):1658-62.

12.   Deepthi B, Varun D, Gopal PN, Rao CH, Sumalatha G. Super porous hydrogels–Supreme drug delivery. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011;4(8):1182-8.

13.   Saranya R, Elango K, Devi DN, Balaguru A. Formulation and Evaluation of Hydrogel for Stomach Specific Drug Delivery of Lamivudine. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2013;6(7):740-5.

14.   Kundu T, Mukherjee K, Biswanath S. Hydrogel beads composed of sodium carboxymethyl xanthan and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose for controlled release of aceclofenac: effect of formulation variables. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2012;5(1):103-13.

15.   Saleem MA, Kulkarni RV, Patil NG. Formulation and evaluation of chitosan based polyelectrolyte complex hydrogels for extended release of metoprolol tartrate. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011;4(12):1844-51.

16.   Sami AJ, Khalid M, Jamil T, Aftab S, Mangat SA, Shakoori AR, Iqbal S. Formulation of novel chitosan guargum based hydrogels for sustained drug release of paracetamol. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2018 Mar 1;108:324-32.

17.   Sharma PK, Asthana GS, Asthana A. Formulation development and evaluation of hydrogel based gastroretentive drug delivery system of antihypertensive drug. Int. J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016;8(10):1396-401.

18.   Malviya V, Thakur Y, Gudadhe SS, Tawar M. Formulation and evaluation of natural gum based fast dissolving tablet of Meclizine hydrochloride by using 3 factorial design 2. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2020;6(2):94-100.

19.   Malviya V, Burange P, Thakur Y, Tawar M. Enhancement of Solubility and Dissolution Rate of Atazanavir Sulfate by Nanocrystallization. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2021 Jul 1;55(3):S672-80.

20.   Malviya VR, Tawar MG. Preparation and Evaluation of Oral Dispersible Strips of Teneligliptin Hydrobromide for Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology. 2020 Jan 31;13(1):4745-52.

21.   Malviya V, Manekar S. Design, Development and Evaluation of Aceclofenac and Curcumin Agglomerates by Crystallo Co-Agglomeration Technique. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):1535-41.

22.   Shoichet MS, Li RH, White ML, Winn SR. Stability of hydrogels used in cell encapsulation: An in vitro comparison of alginate and agarose. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 1996 May 20;50(4):374-81.

23.   Malviya V. Preparation and Evaluation of Emulsomes as a Drug Delivery System for Bifonazole. Indian journal of pharmaceutical education and research. 2021 Jan 1;55(1):86-94.

24.   Malviya V. Design and Characterization of Thermosensitive Mucoadhesive Nasal Gel for Meclizine Hydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology. 2022 Feb 28;15(1):5782-93.

 

 

 

 

Received on 15.12.2021       Modified on 26.02.2022

Accepted on 02.05.2022   ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2022; 12(4):281-286.

DOI: 10.52711/2231-5691.2022.00045